Transitioning

November 15, 2008 – 9:48 am

I’m honored to be named as co-leader of the FCC review team for the Obama-Biden Transition Project, along with the wonderful and brilliant Susan Crawford.  (Yes, “Ken Werbach” is me — I’m working on getting the typo fixed on the website.)

The FCC has a vital role to play in the nascent Network Age. During the campaign, Barack Obama and his advisors demonstrated an understanding of the transformative power of today’s communications technologies.  I’m excited to help carry over that understanding in the Transition to his Administration.

Bear with me — I won’t be able to respond to emails, tweets, and phone calls as quickly or reliably as I’d like.  We have a tremendous amount of work to do, and not much time to do it.  But I’m fired up, and ready to go.

Yes. we. did.

November 5, 2008 – 1:40 am

Tonight, we celebrate.

Tomorrow, we roll up our sleeves and get to work.

Election Day

November 4, 2008 – 7:53 am

I made up my mind long ago to vote for Barack Obama.  My confidence in that choice has only grown.  Today is the moment of truth.

To Obama supporters, this is not the time to ease up.  If we lose this thing now, we have no one to blame but ourselves.  I’m spending the day as an Election Observer in a working class precinct, to ensure everyone can exercise their right to vote.  (It’s scary that the Obama campaign needs to mobilize thousands of lawyers to defend the democratic process in the world’s leading democracy, but that’s the reality after 2000 and 2004.)  Please, if you want Obama to win, take a few minutes to encourage your friends, or a few hours to make calls and knock on doors to get out the vote.  Stand in line as long as it takes to cast your vote.  Remember, the next four years — and much beyond — depend on what happens today.

And if, somehow, you’re still undecided, let me make one final pitch.

There are many reasons to vote for Obama on the issues. His early opposition to the Iraq War and his steady response to the recent financial crisis give an indication of how well he reacts to challenges. On technology, the focus of my career and the foundation for our economy going forward, there is simply no comparison between the candidates.  Obama gets it, deeply gets it.  Just look at how masterfully his campaign leveraged the Net.  McCain simply repeats the old ideological mantras.  Ask yourself this: did Larry and Sergey decide whether to start Google based on marginal tax rates?  Was it pure luck the Internet revolution centered on the United States, or did good policies have something to do with it?  (Conversely, is it pure luck that other countries are surpassing us in broadband today?)  And why are we not using the most empowering technologies ever developed to make our government and society more transparent and more efficient?  As Obama says, we don’t need more or less government, we need competent government.  Now, more than ever.

In the end, though, the issues aren’t the entire story.  At a difficult moment in our history, would you rather remember that you voted out of hope or fear?  Would you rather recall that you supported the candidate who has gone weeks running nothing but negative ads, mostly vicious attacks on his opponent’s patriotism, honor, and ethics?  (Because if McCain wins, that will be the political playbook for every candidate of the foreseeable future.)  If you agree the country is on the wrong track, do you want to give another term to the party that has been running it for eight years?  Do you want the storyline on Wednesday and beyond to be, “America repudiates the policies of George W. Bush and the politics of Karl Rove,” or would you prefer, “Americans decide they aren’t ready for change?”  Because that is our choice.

One final reason, lost in the hurlyburly of the campaign.  When I tuck my two children in at night, I tell them: You can be anything you want to be.  Isn’t that what every parent believes?  And then I think: If Barack Obama can become the President of the United States of America, so can anyone who works hard, gets a good education, and devotes him or herself to public service.  If the American people respond to Obama’s intelligence and good judgment and leadership, there is something right about the country I will leave to my children.

Obama is not perfect, and he may fail.  That’s true of us all.  There is no easy or quick way out of the dark corner George W. Bush and his cronies led us into.  Obama isn’t pretending otherwise.  But as Colin Powell and Warren Buffett and Francis Fukuyama and Eric Schmidt and The Economist and many others have acknowledged, Obama has come through the great trial of a two-year campaign and shown that he deserves our vote.  Those are the kinds of “associations” I trust.  His thoughtfulness and steadfastness are there for all to see.  He has surrounded himself with brilliant, experienced advisors of all ideological stripes, which is important because, well, it takes a village to run a country.

So put aside the caricatures and the carefully-planted doubts, and just listen to what the man is saying.  Obama is ending the campaign where it began, and where he started four years ago in his famous speech at the Democratic Convention: talking about bridging the divides that separate Americans from each other, and from the world.  That’s what we need in a President today.  Let’s make it happen.

Relative Performance

September 16, 2008 – 10:51 am

Let me get this straight.

Bill Clinton comes into office in 1992, and Wall Street is terrified that the Democrats will raise taxes and screw up the economy.  Instead, Clinton puts world-class economic minds into top positions.  The result is a spectacular economic boom, for the stock market as well as ordinary Americans.  Yes, there was the dotcom bust, but that didn’t touch the fundamentals of the economy, and just a couple years later the entrepreneurial tech sector was growing again.

George Bush comes into office in 2000.  The stock market has gone sideways over a period of eight years.  We’ve spent a vast fortune on the war in Iraq, with no end in sight.  The deficit is through the roof, and most other economic indicators are much worse.  And then, we get the housing meltdown, and the credit crisis that is taking out huge chunks of Wall Street as we speak. Bush’s economic team does little to inspire confidence, and much to destroy it.

Now, tell me why an entrepreneur or businessperson would vote for the Republican in this election?

Oh, and don’t forget that John McCain was one of the “Keating 5″ sanctioned in the S&L debacle, which was the economic mess the previous time the Republicans held the White House.

I have no problem with religious fundamentalists supporting Palin/McCain.  I have a big problem with entrepreneurs and businesspeople telling me they oppose Obama because he’s going to raise their taxes.  Doesn’t relative performance mean anything in finance?  Would you rather have the Bush economy or the Clinton economy?  Because the evidence is pretty clear that the Democrats today are the responsible stewards of the domestic and global economy.

TPRC Conference coming up

September 10, 2008 – 2:31 pm

For the past few years, I’ve had the honor of serving on the board of TPRC, the leading research conference on telecom, information, and Internet policy.  If you really want to understand tech policy,  especially the cutting-edge issues, TPRC is the place to go.

The 36th annual TPRC will be held September 26-28, 2008 at George Mason University Law School in Arlington, VA.  William E. Kovacic, Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission, will be the Keynote Speaker. Panelists include Pam Samuelson, Jonathon Zittrain, Robert Cannon, Dave Clark, Eli Noam,  Nicholas Economides, Dale Hatfield, Reed Hundt and Michael Marcus.  TPRC is a non-profit, non-partisan, academic event.  If you’re an academic, lawyer, economist, or policy advocate interested in telecom and Internet policy, I encourage you to attend.

Register at http://www.trpc.org.

Seeking great people to work on Supernova

August 18, 2008 – 10:42 am

I’ve organized the Supernova technology conference for the past seven years.  I’m proud of it.  I think it has a pretty good record of staying ahead of the curve and bringing together compelling people, companies, and ideas.

I plan Supernova myself, with a small virtual team.  It’s not even my primary gig — I have a full-time (and then some) job as a professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania… when I’m not being a dad, Obama supporter, consultant, or something else.  The Supernova organization coalesces every year for the conference.  We have no office or employees.  Most tech events in the same category are run by big outfits like O’Reilly, the Wall Street Journal, or IDG, who have full-time staffs for sales, event management, PR, and other functions.  Heck, even TechCrunch has 15 employees working on the TechCrunch 50 conference, and Loic Le Meur spent over 1 million Euros this year to produce LeWeb.  Don’t get me wrong, those are terrific conferences.  But Supernova is something different.

I’ve always believed that an event dedicated to new forms of decentralized collaboration and business organization should eat its own dog food.  Supernova itself is a testament to the power of networks.  My personal social network of executives, academics, technologists, policy experts, international figures, government officials, and others helps Supernova transcend the Silicon Valley echo chamber. Moreover, being independent and virtual makes us more nimble.  Supernova was successful in the post-crash year of 2002 as well as the boom year of 2006, and everything in between.  We partner with all kinds of individuals and organizations, which contribute to the event and get value themselves.  We can move quickly on great ideas, and we can take risks; we’re not locked into anything that we’ve done before.

I like to think this makes for a better conference.  I know it makes the process more exhilarating and fun.

Which brings me to the point.  Supernova 2009 will be held in mid-June in San Francisco.  I’m seeking great people to work on the event.  There are some functions I’m looking to address — web/blog management, bookkeeping, social media marketing, online video production, and project management, for starters — but getting the right people is most important.  I’m trying to find self-starters who can take ownership of a task and run with it.  I want pro-active communicators who are flexible and able to see the big picture.  Most of all, I need people who grok what Supernova is about, and are excited to take it to the next level.  Being involved with Supernova is a fantastic way to make contacts, gain visibility, and build your own knowledge base.

If this sounds appealing to you or someone you know, email me. Tell me what you do, how you can contribute to Supernova, and what your expectations are in terms of time and compensation.  Every relationship is unique; we’ll have people working on an hourly, project, and in-kind basis, over many potential time periods between now and June 2009.

I’ve never issued a public call like this before.  I’m not quite sure what I’ll get.  I just think it’s time to take another step with Supernova, and I know I can’t do it alone.

McCain’s Technology Non-Plan

August 15, 2008 – 12:58 pm

The McCain technology plan is finally out.  As expected, it’s light on what most of us understand as “technology policy.”  There are many platitudes about the glories of lower taxes and private investment, but little understanding of just how profoundly communications and information technologies are changing our world.

The good news, I suppose, is that McCain is finally talking about technology issues which he resolutely ignored for most of the campaign, and which his advisors dismissed as not worthy of Presidential attention.  McCain’s well-documented lack of tech savvy is clearly making an impression on voters.  Voters understand that technology is an essential and growing element of life and work for Americans of all ages and economic levels.  And they understand that technology isn’t just another set of interest groups; it’s the mechanism for addressing all the big challenges our nation faces, from health care to energy to education.

McCain’s campaign issuing a tech plan doesn’t change anything about his personal level of tech sophistication.  At least, it lets people know where he stands.  Or does it?  When you get below the headings of McCain’s plan, it becomes clear that this is a document designed to say all things to all people.

A few quick examples:

Obama’s plan explains the significance of an open Internet and proposes specific policies to ensure it.   McCain endorses the FCC’s “four freedoms” for Internet users, says he will act “when regulation is warranted,” but then specifically opposes network neutrality.  Huh?

Obama’s plan has a powerful set of proposals to create a connected digital democracy, including a federal CTO and transparency of all government decision-making.  McCain vaguely supports putting more government information online.

Obama’s plan sets out a comprehensive national broadband strategy, recognizing that the US went from global leader to a laggard during the Bush Administration.  McCain cobbles together tangentially related historical positions (his support for spectrum auctions), no-brainers (allowing municipalities to deploy broadband networks), and more tax cuts (”reward” companies that serve low-income customers).

See the pattern here?  Where Obama has specifics and new ideas, McCain has  old ideas and positions that would be taken for granted in any Administration other than the one now ending.  The reason is that McCain has a problem: he’s out of step with the real world.

Real businesspeople appreciate that the doctrinaire talk of keeping government from crushing private-sector innovation has little to do with the actual situation in the technology industry.  It’s not like the US fell behind in technology the past eight years because government was too active.  Though it may sound good in the inside-the-Beltway world John McCain has inhabited the past quarter century, the reality is that the primary factor in innovation isn’t the tax rate; it’s the competitive, entrepreneurial, and social climate.  That’s why Meg Whitman, one of McCain’s most visible technology advisors, personally urged all eBay users to support network neutrality, back when she was the company’s CEO. Has she changed her views?

Those who drafted McCain’s plan must understand this tension.  So they’ve come up with ways to hint at the truth, while ultimately staying on message.  McCain’s plan declares his support for the goals of network neutrality, but unwillingness to do anything about it.  It encourages greater broadband deployment, but rewards companies for doing what they were already doing, rather than pushing the envelope.  It alludes to his earlier involvement in spectrum auctions, while saying nothing about current spectrum debates, where Obama has come down strongly on the side of innovation. And it highlights McCain’s Senate positions, without explaining how someone who spent so much time engaged with the technology world has so little personal understanding of it.

All in all, typical political strategy.  McCain is talking about technology now in order to make it a non-issue.  He wants to blunt the growing perception that he isn’t a 21st-century President.  I think the American people are smarter than that.  The contrast between the two candidates on technology issues is pretty clear, and McCain’s plan does little to change that.

Wireless: Walled Gardens to Walled Markets?

August 11, 2008 – 9:12 am

T-Mobile, the #4 US wireless carrier, is moving to an App Store model for all its phones.  In other words, users will be able to choose their own applications, as they now do on Apple’s iPhone.  Along with Google Android/Open Handset Alliance, Verizon’s open development initiative, and the success of Apple’s App Store, this is good news for wireless subscribers in the US.  For too long we’ve been stuck with a poor set of apps and features pre-selected by the carriers.

However, a series of walled application stores is not the same as an Internet-like open platform.  Developers still need to go through the bottleneck of Apple’s and T-Mobile’s (and soon, most likely, AT&T’s and Sprint’s and Verizon’s) certification process, pricing policies, and so forth.  Not to mention that we’re just talking about the US here.  The US is a big mobile market, but less than a tenth of the the global handset total.

I’m pleasantly surprised how quickly the major US operators are backing off their policies of tightly controlling handsets and applications.  The question is whether the shift will stop at walled markets, or move toward a truly open environment.