As I plan for Supernova 2007 (next June 20-22 in San Francisco), I’m thinking a great deal about what’s next. I had a great time at Web 2.0, and give kudos to Tim, John, Eric, and the other organizers for capturing the zeitgeist. No event can be all things to all people, and on its own terms, Web 2.0 was a smashing success. My conference has a different emphasis. Supernova is designed to be just ahead of the curve, focused on technologies and ideas that are poised to enter the mainstream and explode. It’s a place where the geeks, developers and other innovators can come together with the executives, investors, and businesspeople.
Five years ago, when I started the conference, we focused on things like blogging, rich Internet applications, social software in the enterprise, online video, collective intelligence, and the disruptive potential of a little company called Google — aka, pretty much everything that today is the core of Web 2.0. The market has shifted, as I knew it someday would. The deal-making, the funding announcements, and the massive publicity are back. But that’s not the same as innovation.
So, now what? I’m not interested in rehashing (or remashing) the same themes, let alone taking a long-pedigreed concept like the semantic web and slapping a Web 3.0 label on it. I don’t think you are either.
I’m thinking hard about how to blow people’s minds at Supernova 2007. In frothy times like these, I want to challenge assumptions and push the envelope. I have plenty of ideas I’m pursuing. But I’d also value your input. I see only a fraction of the innovation and powerful ideas emerging in the Internet ecosystem today.
So, tell me, via comments on this blog post or by email, what you think we should address at Supernova 2007. Companies, people, ideas, whatever. If you thought Web 2.0 was missing things, what were they? What would you find it valuable to see and discuss at an executive-level emerging technology conference today? What’s next?